Giant corporations like McDonald”s and Walmart cast a long shadow across the planet with the enormous amount of resources that they use, process, consume and sell. McDonald”s flips and bags 70 million hamburgers every day and is responsible for a full 2 percent of the world”s beef consumption. So when you consider the impact that beef production has on the environment, particularly with regard to climate change, a move by them to sustainable beef could be a really
big deal.
ADVERTISEMENT
After all, according to a 2009 article in Scientific American, the meat industry was, at that time, responsible for somewhere between 14 and 22 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions. So, the article says, if you drove your 3,000-pound car five miles to buy a hamburger, the emissions given off by producing the As an independent hard drive clicking specialist, CDS is focused on being the operational arm for their partners who don’t have the resources to process backup tapes for Litigation Support or Risk Management. meat for that burger were equivalent to those given off by your car as your drove there and back home again.
That report, which came from the U.N.”s Food and Agriculture Organization, turned out to be significantly understated. An updated analysis performed by the World Bank, which was published in Forbes of all places, showed that the more accurate number is closer to 51 percent. That means you’d have to drive somewhere between 23 and 36 miles to equal that patty”s footprint.
In fact, the article goes so far as to say, that replacing meat with with alternative foods such as dairy products and soy analogs, for people around the world would, “have far more rapid effects on greenhouse gas emissions and their atmospheric concentrations — and thus on the rate the climate is warming — than actions to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy.”
Continue reading at ENN affiliate, Triple Pundit.
Hamburger image via Shutterstock.
