Human response to climate

Throughout history, humans have responded to climate.
Take, for example, the Mayans, who, throughout the eighth and 10th centuries,
were forced to move away from their major ceremonial centers after a series of
multi-year droughts, bringing about agricultural expansion in Mesoamerica, and
a clearing of forests. Much later, in the late 20th century, frequent droughts
caused the people of Burkina Faso in West Africa to migrate from the dry north
to the wetter south where they have transformed forests to croplands and cut
the nation’s area of natural vegetation in half. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Such land transformations, while necessary to ensure future crop
productivity, can themselves have large ecological impacts, but few studies
have examined their effects. To that end, a Princeton University research team
has created a model to evaluate how a human response to climate change may
alter the agricultural utility of land. The study, featured in Conservation Biology, provides a readily transferable method for conservation planners
trying to anticipate how agriculture will be affected by such adaptations.

“Humans can transform an ecosystem much more rapidly and
completely than it can be altered by shifting temperature and precipitation
patterns,” said Lyndon Estes, lead author and associate research scholar
in the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs. “This
model provides an initial approach for understanding how agricultural land-use might
shift under climate change, and therefore which currently natural areas might
be converted to farming.”

A Princeton University research team has created a readily
transferable method for conservation planners trying to anticipate how
agriculture will be affected by such adaptations. They tested their model by
studying South Africa’s wheat and maize production in an area projected to be
vulnerable to climate change.

Before determining how climate change could impact the crops, the team
first needed to determine which areas have been or might be farmed for maize
and wheat. They created a land-use model based on an area’s potential crop
output and simulated how much of each crop was grown from 1979 to 1999 – the
two decades for which historical weather data was available. They also
calculated the ruggedness of each area of land, which is related to the cost of
farming it. Taking all factors into account, the model provides an estimate of
whether the land is likely to be profitable or unprofitable for farming.

To investigate any climate-change impacts, the team then examined the
production of wheat and maize utilizing 36 different climate-response scenarios
taking into account the many possible future climates and the crops response to
rising levels of carbon dioxide.

Read more at the Princeton
University Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
.

Image of Africa
and wheat
images via Shutterstock; morphed by Robin Blackstone.
   

Leave a Reply